Mango vs Regular taxi

Comparison page

Mango provides a modern alternative: better value for passengers and a smarter digital operating model for drivers.

Passengers: quality and reliability

Drivers: net earnings and lower fee pressure

Transparent comparison with methodology

Premium ride experience

Fast pickup and real-time tracking

Coverage across major Dutch cities

Secure booking and payment flow

Economic lens

Why this difference matters

Psychology insight

Work smarter

Drivers who optimize digitally and protect margin today build a stronger independent taxi business tomorrow.

Passenger focus

Reliable premium rides

Certified drivers and consistent quality.

Driver focus

Keep more net income

Lower-fee model and stronger sustainable margins.

For passengers

Comparison across quality, pricing profile, and support for daily rides.

Criteria	Mango	Regular taxi	Regular taxi
Fare level	Often lower than traditional taxi options	Typically higher traditional fare levels	Typically higher traditional fare levels
Transparency	Upfront fare context and live ride visibility	Meter and operator dependent	Meter and operator dependent
Digital experience	Full app + web journey	Not always modernized	Limited digital flow in many cases

Passenger information is directional and can differ by city.

For drivers

Comparison across platform fees, net earnings, and operational control.

Criteria	Mango	Regular taxi	Regular taxi
Ride demand flow	Digital demand stream with realtime tools	Often dispatch/stand dependent	Often dispatch/stand dependent
Operational efficiency	App-first operations and clear trip context	More manual coordination	More manual coordination
Future readiness	Scalable platform model with lower fee pressure	Traditional operating model	Traditional operating model

Driver claims depend on ride mix, working hours, city, and current demand.

We combine public tariff information, product terms, and support standards. Comparative claims are reviewed periodically.

Last updated: February 2026